The
"American Wisdom Series" 
presents
Pamphlet
#605
Will We
be
Better
Off?
When Our Government succeeds in making private ownership of guns illegal; will our children be better off?
If
so,
wouldn't
our children also be better off if match books and cigarette lighters were
declared illegal?
Wouldn't
many less children be killed in fires,
both
accidental and arson?
If only one child were to be saved is it not worth the inconvenience to us all?
If so,
We
already know the dangers of fatty food intake.
If
our government should declare hamburger illegal to own or cook,
we
would not spend nearly what we currently do for health care,
and
our children would certainly be better off;
If only one child were to be saved is it not worth the inconvenience to us all?
If so,
The
birth rate is rising and creating alarmingly high population statistics.
If
government would require half of the population to be neutered we could
cut the birth rate in half.
Wouldn't
the children who are then born be much better off and their future much
brighter?
If only one child were to be better off is it not worth the inconvenience to us all?
If
so,
Hard
candy!
How
many children do you suppose choke on hard candy each year?
If
our government were to make hard candy illegal we could save those children.
If only one child were to be saved wouldn't it be worth the inconvenience to us all?
If
so,
Pillows,
we
are constantly hearing about children suffocating during their sleep because
a pillow covered their face.
Pillows
are not necessary and should be outlawed.
If only one child was to be saved would it not be worth the inconvenience to us all?
If
so,
Swimming
pools,
children
and adults are always drowning in swimming pools.
They
should be outlawed.
Wouldn't
it be better for us all and worth the inconvenience if government just
plain outlawed them?
If only one child was to be saved would it not be worth the inconvenience to us all?
If
so,
Helmets,
children
and adults are always receiving head injuries while riding bicycles and
motor cycles.
Wouldn't
both be better off if we made it illegal to ride a bike without wearing
a helmet?
Oh!
We've
already done that; and we still have head
injuries!
Then
should we not outlaw the riding of bikes?
If only one child was to be saved would it not be worth the inconvenience to us all?
If
so,
Cigarettes,
we
have already taken steps to prevent our children from becoming addicted
to nicotine
because
of the high cost of medical expense from lung cancer.
Should
we do something about the drain on our health care system
by
the people who live longer then smokers by twenty or thirty years?
Their
health care requirements,
which
are many times caused by unwise behavior should be evaluated!
A good case for outlawing automobiles
Seat
belts,
We
would all be safer if we wore seat belts while traveling in an automobile.
We
should make it illegal to travel without a seat belt.
OH!
We
already did that; and we still have injuries.
Then we should outlaw automobile travel!
After
all with the advent of the computer
most
people will eventually be working from home
so
there is no legitimate reason for automobile travel!
Outlawing
Automobiles would also eliminate our driving under the influence problem;
which
is further justification for government to make automobile travel illegal.
This would also solve the problem we now have of unconstitutional sobriety check points!
Why stop there?
We
can go on and on with examples of things we Americans use and do that cause
loss of life,
health
or injury.
Of
all the things mentioned,
there
isn't one that if lost could permanently cost us our total freedom,
except
the loss of our guns;
yet
gun ownership and access
seems
to be the one thing we are most willing
to
allow government to restrict.
What can it hurt?
Every
dictatorship or communist country in the world
first
had to confiscate private citizens weapons.
Don't you not think we may have a potential dictator want-to-be in our country?
What if?
What
if, one year,
the
out-going president of the United States,
after
putting all his loyal cohorts in positions of power as Military leaders,
Heads
of the CIA and the FBI, Police Commissioners of major cities, etc.,
decided
he wasn't going to step down
and
"we
the people" were no longer armed?
This is a fact!
Since
the dawn of human history,
those
with weapons rule;
those
without weapons,
serve.
Look at the world prior to 1776;
that
is exactly where the world will return
within
thirty years of the disarming of Americas private citizens.
No Free America without private weapons ownership!
In 1776,
if the King of England and his British Troops had been successful,
at Lexington and Concord, confiscating our forefathers weapons
like they had been successful in Boston;
then disarming the rest of Massachusetts
and after that Virginia, New York and Pennsylvania
and if our forefathers had allowed that to happen,
our
"representative republic" form of government
would
never have been born in America
and
much of the freedom enjoyed by people
in
the rest of the world
would
never have come about..
We are taking our freedom too lightly!
If
we allow our government to succeed in taking our guns
we
will then have to depend on outlaws
to regain our freedoms.
I
don't know about you,
but
I don't want to place my future well being in the hands of outlaws!
If
we continue to support the two major parties
who
have taken us to where we are,
I fear for our future.
I call on good Citizens
whatever your race
the rich and the poor,
the strong and the weak,
from our smallest towns,
to our largest cities,
all of us living in Pennsylvania
and out of Pennsylvania
to change your party affiliation;
become a member of a Constitutionally Focussed Third Party;
become a principled candidate
for Local office,
for County office,
for State office,
for National office;
You don't want to become a candidate?
You can still help!
work to help elect
principled Constitutionally Focussed Third Party candidates;
help pass out literature
help man polling places on election day
help by making phone calls
vote for
Principled Constitutionally Focussed Third Candidates.
Constitutional
Statement of Principles