What Was The Motive Behind The Bombing?

"Governments, in order to perpetuate themselves,
will sacrifice 400-500 people without a second thought."
                                        — 14-year DEA veteran Basil Abbott

      To understand the motive behind the Oklahoma City bombing,
one must understand the political situation in the country at the time.

      In 1989, with the fall of the Berlin Wall, the Cold War was officially over.
The intelligence community was in danger of losing its appropriations;
it needed a new mission.

      In 1963, the Kennedy administration was said to have commissioned
a select group of analysts and scholars to evaluate the problems inherent in a post-Cold War society.
Entitled Report from Iron Mountain on the Possibility and Desirability of Peace,
its conclusions and validity have been hotly debated since its "unauthorized" publication in 1967.

      Although featured on the front page of the New York Times
and subsequently translated into 15 different languages,
many establishment icons and media pundits
would only acknowledge the work as a "clever satire."

      The Times, which received a "no comment" response from the LBJ White House
while attempting to verify its authenticity,
wrote that the possible hoax was a possibly suppressed report.[1196]

      Others, such as Colonel L. Fletcher Prouty (Ret.),
former Chief of the Special Operations Division for the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
      quoted from the document in his book,
The Secret Team.
And renowned economist, author, and professor John Kenneth Galbraith wrote
"As I would put my personal repute behind the authenticity of this document,
so I would testify to the validity of its conclusions.
My reservations relate only to the wisdom of releasing it to an obviously unconditioned public."

      As late as 1995, The Nation was still denigrating the report as a "hoax,"
while the Wall Street Journal was seriously debating its merits.
As Robert Tomsho wrote in the May 9, 1995 edition of the Journal:

      Given the tumultuous times when the document surfaced
and the air of respectability surrounding those involved with it,
few readers were willing to dismiss the mysterious headline-grabbing book as a hoax.

      Whether or not Report from Iron Mountain was in fact a hoax,
the report's conclusions, even its detractors will admit,
lend a somewhat prescient and frightening measure of truth to contemporary 20th century reality.

      Written in cold, empirical think-tank language,
the report postulates that war is the fundamental basis for all political,
social, and economic unity.

      The report also suggests, in somewhat Machiavellian fashion,
initiating "ritual blood games," renewing "slavery,"
and creating an "omnipotent" international police force as mitigating substitutes
for the alleged socio-economic void created by a post-Cold War society.
The report defined the sociological implications thusly:

      War, through the medium of military institutions,
has uniquely served societies,
throughout the course of known history,
as an indispensable controller of dangerous social dissidence
and destructive antisocial tendencies….
No modern political ruling group has successfully controlled its constituency
after failing to sustain the continuing credibility of an external threat of war.

      The war system makes the stable government of societies possible.
It does this essentially by providing an external necessity
for a society to accept political rule.…
An effective substitute for war would require "alternate enemies".…

      A paranoid and fascistic national security establishment,
no longer primarily focused on the "external necessity"
of an outward military threat (e.g: the Soviet Union),
must inevitably turn its attention towards the ever-present specter of an internal threat —
      the "alternate enemy." As the report states:

      …the motivational function of war requires the existence of a genuinely menacing social enemy.…
The "alternate enemy" must imply a more immediate,
tangible, and directly felt threat of destruction.…

      The Oklahoma City bombing, occurring as it did in the "heartland" of America,
served as no other "terrorist" act has in the history of the United States
in channeling the attention of the American people towards the "immediate,
tangible, and directly felt threat of destruction."

      More significantly,
it did so by directing the attention of the public towards an "alternate enemy"
— in this case — an "internal" one.

      Such mass-psychological manipulation by the ruling elite is simply the war spirit refocused.
This ubiquitously American quality, so effectively used against the Germans in the 1940s,
the Communists in the 1950s, and the Iraqis in the 1990s,
would now be directed inward — against the Patriot/Militia movement.

      By linking Timothy McVeigh to the Militia movement
through a massive media propaganda campaign,
the Militia movement is seen as the primary motivational force behind the bombing.
The movement, becomes, by proxy, the new "alternate enemy."

      By substituting what it terms a "fictive model" for war,
the Plutocracy engages the false sentiments of the masses,
creating, as it states, "a sociomoral conflict of equally compelling force and scope."
From the perspective of the ruling elite, this sociomoral conflict must:

      … justify the need for taking and paying a "blood price" in wide areas of human concern.…
The fictive models would have to carry the weight of extraordinary conviction,
underscored with a not inconsiderable actual sacrifice of life.

      That shocking revelation was written in 1963.
Thirty-two years later, former presidential advisor Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.
would write in Foreign Affairs,
the journal of the Council on Foreign Relations,
that mouthpiece of the plutocratic establishment:

      We are not going to achieve a new world order
without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money.

      Quite a profound statement,
coming as it did less than two months after the Oklahoma City bombing.

      Was this "blood price" carried out on April 19, 1995?

      The utilization of barbaric acts of mass-terror-murder by governments
in order to manipulate political objectives is hardly new.

Deliberately manipulated outrage-incidents such as the sinking of the Lusitania,
the burning of the Reischtag, and the attack on Pearl Harbor,
as precursors to elite-planned military campaigns has historically held several functions:
      it triggers the built-in nationalistic war spirit,
channels the resulting righteous wrath toward the nominated enemy,
and concentrates power in the executive branch,
where elite control is unhampered by popular influence.

      As President Franklin D. Roosevelt,
who allowed 2,403 servicemen to be slaughtered at Pearl Harbor
to initiate America's entry into WWII, said:
"In politics, nothing happens by accident.
If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way."

      The American public, brainwashed by the conventional wisdom of history,
with an attention span as long as the latest TV sitcom,
is oblivious to this fact.
A public consumed by materialism and stultified by television
poses no serious threat to the ruling plutocracy.
      A savvy populace, intimately aware of the corruption in government,
and threatening to expose or even depose the powers behind it,
poses a very serious threat to the ruling elite.

      The primary group which stands in the way of plans
of the transnational corporate fascist cabal today
is a group of Americans who call themselves Patriots.
These Patriots — numbering roughly five million men and women —
are comprised of approximately 400,000 individuals who belong to the militant arm: the militia.

      These individuals are increasingly opting out of the federal system.
They are establishing precedents for their own governance,
with names like Sovereign Citizenship, States' Rights and County Rule.

      Some are relinquishing their Social Security cards.
Others refuse to pay income taxes,
which they insist are in direct contravention of the Constitution,
and an illegal outgrowth of the privately-owned Federal Reserve.
Many are buying gold and silver.
Some are even issuing their own currencies.

      They point out the importance our founding fathers attributed to the Second Amendment
— the right to bear arms —
as the first and final bastion against a tyrannical government.

Ultimately, they are willing to defend themselves
against a increasingly oppressive federal system.

      To the government, such a movement must not be allowed to grow teeth,
as did the Anti-War movement of the 1960s,
or the anti-corporate labor movement of the 1930s.
Distrusting the Federal Reserve, believed by some to have engineered the Great Depression,
many of these communities began issuing their own money —
as many as 1,500 different currencies.
As journalist Jon Rappaport notes:

      These events created anxiety for the wealthy one percent of the country.
Things might have gotten out of hand.
There was a danger of mass rebellion, decentralization,
a power shift downward, and so on. World War Two not only solved a job crises, it
      reunified the nation around an external threat.
It temporarily eliminated the possibility of the disintegration of the body politic.

      Like the aforementioned outrage-incidents,
the Plutocracy required a tragedy to manipulate public opinion.
The Oklahoma City bombing served this purpose in the most sublime fashion.
In the aftermath of that tragedy,
the ruling elite sought to unify the nation around an internal threat —
dressed up and repackaged in the form of the Patriot/Militia Movement.

      Many liberal and Left-wing intellectuals and media pundits
have dismissed the notion of the Oklahoma City bombing
as a deliberately engineered act to discredit the militia as preposterous,
self-deluded paranoia.
Yet as former CIA Director William Colby stated to his friend,
Nebraska State Senator John DeCamp, literally days before the bombing:

      "I watched as the Anti-War Movement rendered it impossible
for this country to conduct or win the Vietnam War.
I tell you, dear friend,
that this Militia and Patriot movement in which, as an attorney,
you have become one of the centerpieces,
is far more significant and far more dangerous for America
than the Anti-War Movement ever was, if it is not intelligently dealt with.
And I really mean this."

      In the absence of war,
with the "motivational forces governing human behavior" no longer
"translated into binding social allegiance,"
the ruling elite required a substitute.

By demonizing the Patriot/Militia Movement, the Plutocracy seeks,
both to divide and conquer, and to distract, the population.
As professor and dissident intellectual Noam Chomsky writes:

      Over the last ten years, every year or two,
some major monster is constructed that we have to defend ourselves against.
There used to be one that was always available: the Russians.
But they're losing their attractiveness as an enemy,
and it's getting harder and harder to use that one,
so some new ones have to be conjured up…
They've got to keep coming up, one after another.
You frighten the population, terrorize them, intimidate them.…
That's one of the ways in which you can keep the bewildered herd
from paying attention to what's really going on around them,
keep them diverted and controlled....

      There is yet still another dimension to the situation largely unrealized.
The U.S. banking system is home to trillions of dollars in foreign investment capital,
resident in buildings, real estate, and industry
(The Japanese government currently holds roughly $200 billion in U.S. Treasury securities).
The ruling elite must keep these foreign investors happy.
Should one of them decide to withdraw their funds, it would be "inconvenient."

      But were there a rumor of civil war,
all foreign investors might decide to withdraw their investments.
The resulting collapse would make the crash of 1929 look like a summer picnic.

      Like U.S. industrialists' investments in places such as El Salvador and Guatemala,
foreign investors realize that their money is safest in countries with a happy,
or at least docile and subservient work force.
A population threatening to withdraw from the system and talking of revolution,
represents a risk many foreign investors would prefer not take.
As William Colby pointed out, such events have important people worried.

      Another financial collapse such as the Great Depression,
always looming over the horizon, or the threat of civil war,
requires that the ruling elite have in place a system that allows them to maintain order.
The Anti-Terrorism Bill, the Domestic Insurgency Act,
the militarization of our police forces, operations like Garden Plot and Rex-84-Alpha,
and the murderous violations of the Posse Comitatus Act
in places such as Waco and Ruby Ridge, are all test runs preparing for this eventuality.

      A dramatic event like Oklahoma City, used to crush the political life out of the militias,
would go a long way towards calming the ruling elite and their foreign investors.
Reassured that the Federal Government is still in control of the population,
these investors would hopefully leave their investment capital in place.

      Interestingly, FBI Director Louis Freeh stated before the Senate Judiciary Committee
two days after McVeigh's conviction:
"Most of the militia organizations around the country are not,
in our view, threatening or dangerous."

      Yet on May 13, Freeh stated before the Senate Appropriations Committee
that the focus of the government's domestic anti-terrorism efforts are
"various individuals, as well as organizations,
some having an ideology which suspects government of world-order conspiracies —
individuals who, for various reasons, have organized themselves against the United States."
The chief domestic "enemy," said Freeh,
consists of "individuals who espouse ideologies inconsistent with principles of Federal Government."

      Freeh's alarmist comments impart the genuine concern
which the ruling elite have for the growth of the Patriot/Militia Movement.
As Colby told DeCamp:

      "It is not because these people are armed, that America need be concerned,"
Bill explained to my surprise.
"It is not that these people stockpile weapons and have para-military training sessions,
that they are dangerous" Colby continued.…

      "They are dangerous, John, because there are so many of them.
It is one thing to have a few nuts or dissidents.
They can be dealt with, justly or otherwise, so that they do not pose a danger to the system.
It is quite another situation when you have a true movement — millions of citizens —
believing something,
particularly when the movement is made up of society's average,
      successful citizens."[1210]

      Further evidence of the concern that the ruling elite
have for this popular and growing phenomenon lie in the slanderous comments
      of President Clinton, the huge wave of media propaganda,
and the increase in undercover sting operations aimed at destroying this largely popular movement.

      While the so-called Justice Department was busy covering up evidence of the bombing,
Clinton ardently sought to smear those on the far-Right — the "purveyors of hatred and division,
the promoters of paranoia," as he put it.
"They do practice and they do preach violence against those who are of a different color,
a different background, or who worship a different God.
They do feed on fear and uncertainty. They do promote paranoia...."

      Challenging the American people to follow him in a campaign of divide and conquer,
Clinton charged: "These people attack our government and the citizens who work for it
who actually guarantee the freedoms they abuse....
They can certainly snuff out innocent lives and sow fear in our hearts.
They are indifferent to the slaughter of children.
They threaten our freedoms and our way of life, and we must stop them."

      Echoing and amplifying Clinton's defamations were the mainstream media,
which, all but ignoring the relevant evidence, launched unceasing,
vitriolic attacks against the Patriot/Militia community.
Leading the charge were the ADL and the SPLC, whose connections to the Mossad,
U.S. law-enforcement, and infiltration of the Patriot/Militia community have been well documented.
The ADL's ties to the FBI, in fact, had been forged long ago.

      At the same time, all legitimate expressions and concerns are ignored.
Militia members are portrayed as mostly gun-crazed racists
      with overly conspiratorial views. As Relevance magazine notes:

      If anyone dares to make a suggestion that serious crimes
by high-ranking federal officials or an agency of government have been committed,
that suggestion instantly becomes, almost by definition, a conspiracy theory,
which is itself (almost by definition) beyond the pale of responsible discussion.

      Any attempts by the Left and Right to join together are explained away
by establishment intellectuals as a sort of strange symbiotic aberration.
In a June 19, 1995 New Yorker article entitled "The Road to Paranoia,"
author Michael Kelly describes "views that have long been shared by both the far Right and the far Left,
and that in recent years have come together,
in a weird meeting of the minds, to become one,
and to permeate the mainstream of American politics and popular culture.
You could call it fusion paranoia."

      Yet in spite of the continual barrage of government and media-orchestrated propaganda,
the movement has grown.
This is because the actions of the Plutocracy and its intelligence/law-enforcement minions
have become so bold, so brazen, so outrageous in recent years that it is hard
for the average person not to take notice. Increasing political scandals,
one following on the heals of the other, catastrophic financial debacles,
and the murderous actions of the Federal Government in places such as Waco and Ruby Ridge,
have pushed the average American out of the sonombulic comfort of their easy chair.

      Now the average citizen watches the FBI march into Waco
with tanks and burn women and children,
while President Clinton and the mass-media dismiss them as "just a bunch of whackos."
At the same time he turns around and watches
his neighbor's door kicked in by goon squads to seize piddling amounts of contraband,
while his home and assets are seized without ever being charged with a crime,
then given to law-enforcement agencies who divide up the bounty amongst themselves.

      Compelled to take a closer look at the Patriot/Militia movement,
he begins to understand that the Federal Reserve is a sham.
He realizes that the politics of the nation were corporatized long ago,
that his vote has no meaning.

      He begins to understand that the country is actually controlled by corporate concerns
who use the military and intelligence apparatus to do its bidding.

      He learns how the CIA has illegally intervened and destroyed the sovereignty of dozens of nations
around the world, and assisted in the murder of countless millions.

      He watches with alarm as new laws are being added every day to restrict his Constitutional rights.

      While his pay check is no longer enough to support his family,
he wonders what happened to the Savings and Loans,
and to those wealthy few who were never prosecuted.

      While he sees his job being sent overseas to take advantage
of some poor peasant who slaves for pennies a day,
his own country is slowly being sold off piecemeal.

      Unlike the mass of dumbed-down, TVed-out, passive citizens,
he finally decides to join a group of people who are willing to do something about it.

      Contrary to popular opinion,
the Patriot/Militia Movement is more than just a fringe element of Right-wing conspiracy nuts.
While it still contains individuals who are somewhat myopic
concerning social welfare issues and environmental concerns,
younger people are coming into the movement every day.

      Increasingly, this group represents a broad spectrum of Americans
concerned about governmental corruption and the loss of their Constitutional rights.
Far from being impotent, as Louis Freeh asserts,
the Patriot/Militia Movement represents a threat to an establishment seeking to maintain
corrupt control over its citizenry at all costs.

      While it cannot be said for certain that the Alfred P. Murrah Building
was destroyed as part of a preconceived plan to create
the illusion of a domestic terrorist threat within America
— as a foundation for destroying political dissent —
it is clear that the investigation was politically crafted for just that purpose.

      In March of 1994,
there began an extensive media campaign to portray the militias as Right-wing terrorists.
Numerous sensationalistic stories appeared in the media,
largely orchestrated by the ADL, Political Research Associates (PRA), and the SPLC.

      Then in March of 1995, Congressman Steve Stockman (R-TX) learned that a nation-wide,
early-morning paramilitary raid against militia groups was planned for March 25.
It seemed that a couple of concerned ATF agents
had informed the National Rifle Association (NRA) about the plan,
code-named Operation ROLLING THUNDER.
Stockman immediately fired off a letter to Attorney General Janet Reno:

      It has come to my attention through a number of reliable sources
that an impending raid, by several Federal agencies,
against the "citizen's militias" groups, is scheduled for March 25 or 26 at 4:00 a.m.
A paramilitary style attack against Americans who pose no risk to others,
even if violations of criminal law might be imputed to them,
would run the risk of an irreparable breach between the Federal Government and the public,
especially if it turned out to be an ill considered, poorly planned,
but bloody fiasco like Waco.…

      Stockman's letter went unanswered,
and two Senators who confronted the Assistant Secretary of Defense
were thrown out of his office.

      What is interesting to note, however,
is that the raid was scheduled just one month prior to the Oklahoma City bombing,
that launched the largest anti-militia media campaign ever witnessed.

      Yet the tension surrounding the Militia Movement
wasn't the only pressure beginning to boil the political pot.
Even more interesting events were to occur just prior to the bombing.

      On Monday, April 17, a Special Federal Grand Jury in Little Rock,
AK handed down a sealed indictment charging Hillary Clinton
with bank fraud — misappropriating or embezzling some $47 million dollars from a federally insured S&L,
and benefiting from secret offshore accounts payable to Vincent Foster, Jr.,
her former law partner, as purported payment for "handling" Jonathan Pollard.

      That same evening, April 17,
a military C-21 Lear Jet carrying several high-ranking military officials,
including a supervisor to the NSA, crashed near Alexander City, Alabama.
The disaster, which occured on a clear day,
appeared to be more than a simple accident.
The highly experienced crew reported "fuel management" problems,
a classic sabatogue technique.
Witnesses Miranda Wyckoff and Jimmy Keel claim they heard multiple explosions
while the plane was airborne.

      One story has the passengers as part of a military coup,
to arrest, under the military code, their Commander-in-Chief, William Jefferson Clinton,
for various acts of treason, including the cover-up of Foster's murder.
Another story has an American POW from Laos onboard.
Like Major Charles McKee, they planned to bring him to the attention of the public.

      The plane crashed not far from a secret Delta Force base in Alabama.
It has been rumored that elements of the 20th Special Operations Group (SOG)
guarded Mena airport during the Iran-Contra drug-running.
A Special Federal Grand Jury in Alabama was blocked from investigating the crash.

      The Mena drug-running, intimately connected with the activities of the Iran-Contra Octopus,
was also on the Congressional investigative agenda,
as were the activities of the ATF and FBI at Waco.
The investigations were scheduled to start in May.

      Yet on April 19, two days after the crash, the Oklahoma City Federal Building was bombed.
The bombing conveniently shifted the attention from Clinton's activities at Whitewater,
the ATF and FBI's murderous actions at Waco,
and the Octopus' drug-running at Mena… onto Oklahoma City, and "the new enemy in our midst."

      Were these occurrances coincidences?
And was it a coincidence that two weeks after the bombing,
a group of anonymous, black-hooded,
machinegun-toting federal agents began loading files removed from the Murrah Building
onto two unmarked trucks?

      What were in the files that a over dozen heavily-armed agents were so anxious to hide?
Given the timing of the aforementioned events,
it is likely the files were either records incriminating the Octopus for its drug-running at Mena,
or records incriminating the  ATF for their actions at Waco.

      It may be more than a coincidence that the ATF agents who raided Waco…
wore black uniforms with no identifying badges.

      Interestingly, on the May 14, 1995 edition of "Face the Nation,"
White House Chief of Staff Leon Panetta denounced those chairing the Waco hearings,
claiming that they "wanted to take attention away from the tragedy of Oklahoma City."

      Panetta also called them "despicable." Curiously,
Republican legislators complained bitterly about the Executive Branch's tardy
and disorganized production of documents.
For instance, Representatives could not find in their 48,000 documents
a copy of any April 19 Waco operation plan.

      It has also been suggested that the files removed were records implicating George Bush
and company for their role in selling Iraq biological weapons
that have infected large numbers of American troops and their families.
Peter Kawaja, who served as Louis Champon's chief of security
at his Product Ingredient Technologies in Boca Raton, FL —
which was secretly being used by his business partner Ishan Barbouti, an Iraqi arms dealer,
to produce Cyanide shipped to Iraq —
claims that documents implicating Bush, Secretary of State James Baker,
and others involved in the "Iraqgate" scandal were moved to the Alfred P. Murrah Building.

      Whatever the case, someone was obviously very uptight about some files in the Federal Building —
uptight enough to send a team of hooded, heavily-armed agents to wisk them away.

      Several days after the bombing,
President Clinton sent his much fabled Anti-Terrorism Bill to Congress.
The legislation, originally introduced after the World Trade Center bombing,
had been languishing on the Congressional shelf.
On June 7, the Senate passed the sweeping measure by a vote of 91 to 8.

      Concurrent with the new legislation was a massive smear campaign against the militias,
trumpeted by President Clinton.
As the Sunday Telegraph's Washington correspondent, Ambrose Evans Pritchard, noted:

      The momentum of Republican "revolution" drained away overnight,
as people drew back from the anti-government rhetoric of the Right,
unleashing the startling decline in its fortunes.

President Clinton told reporters that he owed his political comeback to that bomb.
"It broke the spell," he said.

This"American Wisdom Series"pamphlet

is

Published by:

Rhine Publishing Co.

If you would like to have your essay published
as part of the American Wisdom Series
submit your manuscript to Rhine Publishing Co
at the address above for consideration, or e-mail us
at the address shown on our home page.

Click Here to Return to "The American Wisdom Series" home page.